Medicaid
Article

Racism as a public health crisis and the economics of urban hospitals

September 26, 2022
Read time:
Download Fact Sheets
Register now
Share this resource
Subscribe to our Newsletter
By subscribing you agree to with our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Download this as a PDF

On September 14th, St. Vincent Charity Medical Center announced they will cease to provide emergency and inpatient services, including emergency psychiatric services, in Cleveland. In addition to the impact this will have on the local service delivery landscape, there is also the economic consequences of the loss of 600 jobs in the city's Center. Ironically, this announcement was made while I was attending the National Academy for State Health Policy conference, where the particular session I was attending focused on the impact of the built environment on disparities in health outcomes. And while there would seem to be little connection between these issues, it may be worthwhile to talk about the association between hospital economics, urban centers and racism as a public health crisis.

Early health care policy and exploitation

Unless you are a wonk like me, you might not understand the policy history between hospitals and cities. To start, we first must acknowledge how the medical industry has a long and dubious relationship in engendering racism and discrimination in our medical institutions. From the closure of Black-led medical schools to experimentation on Black patients without consent, the industry has long exploited Black communities, and their bodies, for direct financial gain, carrying forward the most harmful legacies of our nation’s history of slavery in passive and obscure ways.  

As momentum gained in the wake of the labor movement to protect individuals from harm in the workplace, and as a consequence of the rise in employer sponsored insurance in the wake of World War II, policy focus was placed on building access to facilities capable of treating newly covered Americans. In 1946, the Hospital Survey and Construction Act of 1946, commonly known as the Hill-Burton Act, “launched the nation on the most comprehensive hospital and public health construction program ever undertaken”. This legislation, which provided millions of dollars to states and local governments, was designed to build “bed” capacity across the country and was incredibly successful in doing so. It was also very intentionally designed so that the economic benefit of the construction was borne mostly in cities and rural communities, where the deepest public health challenges of poverty were apparent. However, while the availability of coverage and services started to grow, it was not made available for all.

 Why provide this history lesson?

The role of government: hospital segregation, Medicare, and Medicaid

Through a disproportionate beneficiary of these resources, southern state Congressional leadership fought against a policy provision that required racial integration in hospitals. Interestingly, this was a provision that was fought for by one of the bill’s main sponsors, Republican Senator (and former Mayor of Cleveland) Harold Burton. Senator Burton was unfortunately unsuccessful, however, and it wasn’t until Simkins v. Cone that the courts affirmed hospital segregation through a “separate-but-equal” standard was unconstitutional. But, like Brown v. Board of Education, the decision largely left it to the states to manage enforcement on a case-by-case basis. In fact, it wasn’t until 1965, with the passage of Medicare and Medicaid by President Lyndon B. Johnson, that hospitals were required to desegregate as a condition of receiving federal funds. So, at this point, you may be asking yourself “why provide this history lesson?”  

Hospitals have been the disproportionate economic beneficiaries of Hill-Burton, the Medicare and Medicaid Act and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. In essence, it has been government, seeking to develop a meaningful public good, that has created the industry. Its existence, in part, is due to the policy trade-off where the government has subsidized the capital, material and workforce needs of the industry in exchange for health service availability. And that is a good thing. But, with the United States lagging nearly all other industrial nations in outcomes and cost, we are at a point where we should demand more from that investment.

 Hospital systems have increasingly shifted their services to the suburbs in a conscious effort to maximize revenue.

Investment, revenue, and economics: hospitals can do better

First, hospital systems have increasingly shifted their services to the suburbs in a conscious effort to maximize revenue. In other words, the business of operating a hospital is often taking precedence over taking care of people in poverty or on Medicaid. And, with poverty and Medicaid coverage disproportionately affecting Black Americans, that inherently contributes to systemic racism in healthcare. Second, hospitals have done more, particularly during COVID, to accommodate service provision through telemedicine. While that can increase access for some, the lack of broadband access in urban centers, coupled with the distrust institutions have engendered, generally, means telemedicine can exaggerate disparities. What’s more, as income taxes from hospitals are often the largest source of revenue for major urban centers like Cleveland, offshoring telemedicine services to far flung geographies can create financial pressure in cities and negatively impact their ability to address basic needs like housing, transit and education.  

In other words, it can deepen social risk factors in Black communities by making it harder to establish a foundation of economic security through basic city services. That also contributes to systemic racism. Mind you, locally, we just built the “Opportunity Corridor,” a functional highway, (next to a train line, by the way), so that our hospitals’ workforce, who does not live in the city, can commute home to suburban communities. One would think we would’ve learned our lessons from redlining and urban renewal, but alas.  

Third, it’s important to note that hospitals do not pay taxes as a function of being non-profit organizations. And while they have community benefit obligations in federal law, those obligations are deeply flawed and in need of change. If there is a direct economic benefit to these businesses, then we need community benefit policies which have an explicitly anti-racist approach, otherwise we are perpetuating the same specters of our racist past, exploiting communities while doing so with federal and state funds.

 We can do it now. We should all expect more.

Three questions to consider when a hospital closes

This is not to say that our hospitals are inherently racist institutions. Far from it. The work of our hospitals to address lead safety, increase staff wages, and build primary care in communities of need are clear examples of an anti-racist approach. But we need to honestly look at our institutions and how they can reform in the direction of justice beyond marketing campaigns, community health need assessment statements and luncheon presentations. Hence why policy proposals which include local government oversight in community benefit are worthy of discussion. So, let’s think about this in the context of the St. Vincent news. With the closure of some services, there are lingering questions about the impact that the loss of a psychiatric emergency department will have on access for individuals in crisis. This is not to say that the very difficult decision made by St. Vincent’s is the wrong one, but rather it should be a signal to the other hospitals, the City and the County to design a response that considers the ways the system can be improved. To that end, here are some recommendations as well as questions to consider that try to synthesize and pull into the foreground the issues outlined above:  

1: Center Community-based Services  

There will always be a need for a psychiatric emergency department. But, can we minimize the number of people who need that level of care? Why is it that we are still underperforming with our access to the Diversion Center? Why will Emergency Medical Services not transport to the Center and should they, or our city’s doctor, be empowered to provide medical clearance to better integrate in the community? Can we implement a Care Response approach? How can we support more community behavioral health and its workforce?  

2: Understand Who Benefits from Closure  

There will be less competition for services in the market. That means there will be more market power concentrated in less hands. So, if services are going to be redistributed, where will that happen? In the city or in a suburban facility? Especially because institutional-based approaches in behavioral health have a long history of perpetuating racism, how can we ensure that services offered are done so in the communities where people want to receive services and with the community-based providers that have the relationships clinically meaningful in ensuring success?

 How do the programming needs tied to the loss of the emergency department inform the community benefit programs of other institutions and who gets to identify the priorities?

3: Thoughtfully Collaborate  

Whatever the individual field or interest, government partners, hospitals, community behavioral health and advocates need to get on the same page about ensuring a successful transition. In looking at St. Vincent’s transition, they are doing what they can to meaningfully stay integrated in the community, but with a different scope and scale. So how can other hospitals support that work? How do the programming needs tied to the loss of the emergency department inform the community benefit programs of other institutions and who gets to identify the priorities? How do levies, relief dollars, opioid settlement monies and Medicaid play a role in ensuring access and equity?

Medicaid Institute on Community Benefit is October 11

And while this is one example, the larger theme of the need to reformat a hospital’s relationship to a community, built around deference to the community in terms of power and resources, still holds. In the coming weeks, The Center for Community Solutions will explore Community Benefit in depth, hosting a Medicaid Institute on Community Benefit with the Lown Institute on October 11. We will be looking at programs in other cities and offer insights into what Ohio cities like Cleveland can do. In the end, if we are serious about ending racial disparities and systemic racism in our institutions, and addressing racism as a public health crisis, we should follow the example of our former Mayor and Senator Harold Burton, and advocate for change. But, unlike Senator Burton, we shouldn’t wait until Medicaid becomes the driving force behind the change. We can do it now. We should all expect more.

Download Fact Sheets

District 10

Download

All Council Districts 2024

Download

District 4

Download

District 2

Download

District 11

Download

District 9

Download

District 8

Download

District 5

Download

District 7

Download

District 1

Download

District 3

Download

District 6

Download

West Boulevard

Download

University

Download

Union-Miles

Download

Tremont

Download

Stockyards

Download

St.Clair-Superior

Download

Old Brooklyn

Download

Ohio City

Download

North Shore Collinwood

Download

Mount Pleasant

Download

Lee-Seville

Download

Lee-Harvard

Download

Kinsman

Download

Kamm's Corners

Download

Jefferson

Download

Goodrich-Kirtland Park

Download

Glenville

Download

Fairfax

Download

Euclid-Green

Download

Edgewater

Download

Downtown

Download

Detroit Shoreway

Download

Cudell

Download

Collinwood-Nottingham

Download

Clark-Fulton

Download

Central

Download

Buckeye-Woodhill

Download

Buckeye-Shaker Square

Download

Brooklyn Centre

Download

Broadway-Slavic Village

Download

Bellaire-Puritas

Download

All Neighborhoods 2024

Download

West Boulevard Factsheet

Download

University Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Union-Miles Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Tremont Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Stockyards Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

St. Clair-Superior Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Old Brooklyn Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Ohio City Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

North Shore Collinwood Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Mount Pleasant Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Lee-Seville Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Lee-Harvard Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Kinsman Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Kamm's Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Jefferson Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Hough Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Hopkins Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Goodrich-Kirtland Park Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Glenville Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Fairfax Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Euclid-Green Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Edgewater Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Downtown Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Detroit Shoreway Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Cuyahoga Valley Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Cudell Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Collinwood-Nottingham Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Clark-Fulton Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Central Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Buckeye-Shaker Square Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Brooklyn Centre Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Broadway-Slavic Village Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

Bellaire-Puritas Neighborhood Factsheet

Download

All Neighborhoods 2016

Download

District 2

Download

District 1

Download

Ohio Women Statewide

Download

All Women Fact Sheets

Download

Wyandot Women

Download

Wood Women

Download

Williams Women

Download

Wayne Women

Download

Washington Women

Download

Warren Women

Download

Vinton Women

Download

Van Wert Women

Download

Union Women

Download

Tuscarawas Women

Download

Trumbell Women

Download

Summit Women

Download

Stark Women

Download

Shelby Women

Download

Seneca Women

Download

Scioto Women

Download

Sandusky Women

Download
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Download report

Subscribe to our newsletter

5 Things you need to know arrives on Mondays with the latest articles, events, and advocacy developments in Ohio

Explore the fact sheets

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

No Related Fact Sheets

Explore Topics

Browse articles, research, and testimony.

Poverty & Safety Net
Article

The Jedi public health approach and four more ways to address weathering

Natasha Takyi-Micah
October 7, 2024
Poverty & Safety Net
Article

Community Solutions supports annual Glenn Leadership Forum, October 18

Tara Britton
October 7, 2024
Poverty & Safety Net
Article

Data Days: Using data for civic engagement, social justice, and advancing policy 

Jason Kluk-Barany
October 7, 2024
Poverty & Safety Net
Article

Current state of Ohio’s state budget

Tara Britton
September 30, 2024
Poverty & Safety Net
Article

Populations growing and shrinking in Cleveland, by age

Emily Muttillo
September 30, 2024